Sinclair Broadcasting is one of the nation's biggest owners of local TV stations. The Maryland-based owner of 185 TV stations has long been airing editorials with a conservative point of view. I have no issue with editorials, as long as they are clearly labeled as such.
But Sinclair pushes its stations to put a political slant on news coverage, which is why Sinclair is dangerous. This is especially risky as more local newspapers are cutting their reporting staff or shutting down altogether.
A Washington Post story explains how Sinclair tells its stations to cover more crime, to show how our larger cities are out of control under Democratic mayors. The company also tells its news directors to put more focus on negative stories involving immigrants, to increase fear and anger among its viewers, who skew older, white and suburban.
Sinclair chairman David Smith, an big supporter of the MAGA movement and its leader, purchased the Baltimore Sun last month. In a private meeting with the Sun’s journalists, according to the Post, he urged them to emulate coverage at the local Sinclair station, with its heavy focus on local crime.
Anne Nelson, a journalist and author of “Shadow Network: Media, Money and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right,” told the Post, “All of it is fearmongering and feeds into a racialized view of cities.” She said that local TV news reports traditionally cover local crime stories, but Sinclair’s programming does it “more than usual, and with a particular message.” The lack of local papers has changed the role of local TV news, she said, leaving local TV and the internet.
The Post said Sinclair’s large network of local stations tend to cover societal problems in similar ways. A 2019 study by researchers at Stanford and Emory universities showed that Sinclair's acquisition of local stations resulted in “substantial increases in coverage of national politics at the expense of local politics” and “a significant rightward shift in the ideological slant of coverage.”
Research also demonstrates that local news reports have a greater level of trust than national outlets, which allows Sinclair to capitalize on that trust, even as it some of its coverage delivers a particular worldview.
In 2018, Sinclair got attention when it directed dozens of its local anchors to read a script that warned viewers that “some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control ‘exactly what people think.’” The statement appeared to echo the then-president's critique of the media and implied that Sinclair was trustworthy in a way that other sources were not.
The network also employed Boris Epshteyn, a former Trump adviser, as its chief political analyst and directed its stations to air Epshteyn’s interview with Trump and his related commentary, according to former employees and internal memos.
A former news director at a Sinclair station in Iowa told the Post he remembered Sinclair’s main office delivering video segments that he and his fellow news directors referred to as “must-run” pieces. “Some of them were biased and from a conservative viewpoint, but many of them were just bad,” he said. “The orders from corporate were just that you must run these; the anchors must read them exactly as written. That’s when the warning bells started to go off.”
He specifically recalled that “they were running this absurd ‘terror alert desk’ just stoking fear that the terrorists are out to get you.” He said “I just couldn’t look myself in the mirror and had to go find another job.”
Unfortunately, Sinclair isn't going anywhere. But their biased reporting masquerading as legitimate news is dangerous, just like FOX News. If it's opinion, it should be clearly labeled as such -- whether on Sinclair stations or in the New York Times.